home.mdx
geo-aeo.mdx
positioning.md
seo.md
gtm-engineering.md
copywriting.md
ux-design.md
audit.md
templates.md
CURRENTLY ACCEPTING 2 CLIENTS / MONTH

Your launch has six heads.
Start with the right cut.

Positioning is upstream of everything. Bad angle: copy does not land, SEO ranks the wrong terms, GTM fills the pipe with the wrong buyers.

// fix positioning first. the rest compounds.

Positioning that sticks
Cited inside ChatGPT
GTM that books calls
Copy that feels seen
↯ no AI slop↯ no account managers↯ no retainer trap↯ no 'circling back'↯ no 12-person zoom calls↯ no jargon you'd be embarrassed to say out loud↯ no 60-page strategy decks↯ no junior writing your homepage↯ no 'we'll get back to you Friday'↯ no AI slop↯ no account managers↯ no retainer trap↯ no 'circling back'↯ no 12-person zoom calls↯ no jargon you'd be embarrassed to say out loud↯ no 60-page strategy decks↯ no junior writing your homepage↯ no 'we'll get back to you Friday'
The six heads

One beast. Six necks. Each one needs its own blade.

Most operators sell one head and pretend the other five do not exist. Below: every head, what it does to your business, and how it gets cut.

Positioning: Sales calls turn into education. Buyers can't repeat what you do.01Head 1 / 6 · sharp angle

Problem #1

Positioning

Sales calls turn into education. Buyers can't repeat what you do.

The pain

You solve ten pains for five personas. The market hears noise and picks the simpler competitor.

The cut

Pick the single angle that prints money. Write the hypothesis, test it live, compare actual vs. expected. Repeat until the pitch lands in one sentence.

Positioning hypothesisICP & wedgeNarrative one-pager
Full service details →
GEO / AEO: Ask ChatGPT about your category. Your name never comes up.02Head 2 / 6 · the new SEO

Problem #2

GEO / AEO

Ask ChatGPT about your category. Your name never comes up.

The pain

LLMs are quietly replacing Google for product research. They only cite the brands they were trained to trust.

The cut

Generative Engine Optimization. Get cited inside ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity through structured content, citations, and trust signals.

LLM citation auditAnswer-ready contentTrust-signal build
Full service details →
GTM Engineering: An SDR burns 40 hours a week and books two meetings.03Head 3 / 6 · automated outbound

Problem #3

GTM Engineering

An SDR burns 40 hours a week and books two meetings.

The pain

Cold outbound is broken. Manual prospecting, generic templates, garbage reply rates.

The cut

AI scrapes, enriches, personalizes, books. One-time build, then it runs. Copy and build in one place: the combination agencies cannot offer.

Outbound system buildLead enrichment pipelinePersonalized message engine
Copywriting: Visitors skim. Nobody books a call. Your homepage could belong to ten other companies.04Head 4 / 6 · feel-seen

Problem #4

Copywriting

Visitors skim. Nobody books a call. Your homepage could belong to ten other companies.

The pain

Copy reads like a polished AI description nobody relates to. Features instead of feelings. Adjectives instead of moments.

The cut

Written the way 1% of sites do it: naming the exact daily pain so the reader feels seen, not pitched at. Specific verbs, specific scenes, zero filler.

Homepage rewriteAbove-the-fold hookVoice & messaging system
UX & Design: Users open the product, squint, and leave inside three minutes.05Head 5 / 6 · human-built

Problem #5

UX & Design

Users open the product, squint, and leave inside three minutes.

The pain

AI-built products get sniffed out in 3 seconds. Generic gradients, stock illustrations, dashboards nobody asked for.

The cut

Strategy-first UX. Brand, onboarding, journey: smooth, gamified where it earns its keep, ruthless about cutting what does not move a metric.

Onboarding teardownKey-journey redesignBrand & visual system
SEO: You publish posts. Traffic flatlines. You blame the algorithm.06Head 6 / 6 · logical puzzle

Problem #6

SEO

You publish posts. Traffic flatlines. You blame the algorithm.

The pain

Ranking feels like dark magic. It is not. It is an intent map, a page-per-intent, and a backend that loads fast.

The cut

Keywords, intent buckets, one page per intent, clean backend, relevant backlinks. Boring. Effective. Compounds for years.

Intent mapPage architectureTechnical SEO fixes
Full service details →
HuntingHydra pipeline

From idea to launched product. End-to-end.

Got an MVP, a website, or just a Notion doc full of ambition? The pipeline takes you from “here's the idea” to “here's traffic, leads, and citations.”

  1. 01

    Hypothesis

    Agree what 'win' looks like before a finger touches a keyboard. No vibes-only campaigns.

  2. 02

    Build

    Positioning, page, copy, SEO scaffold, GEO citations, outbound system: whichever heads were booked.

  3. 03

    Test

    Live with the market for two weeks. Real users, real searches, real LLM queries.

  4. 04

    Compare

    Actual vs. expected. Where we hit, where we missed, what to cut next sprint.

PositioningCopy that feels seenSEO that's just logicGEO / AEOGTM engineeringUX without the BSHypotheses, not vibesPositioningCopy that feels seenSEO that's just logicGEO / AEOGTM engineeringUX without the BSHypotheses, not vibes
VS_THE_REST.csv

Why not just hire an agency?

Because you already tried, or you've watched a friend try. Here is the math.

HuntingHydra
Agency
In-house founder
Marketing hire
Time to first shipped asset
2 days
4-6 weeks
1 quarter
Never (still hiring)
Who actually writes the copy
Direct, no junior
Junior + AI
You, at 11pm
Contractor #3
Positioning + SEO + GEO + GTM
All of it
Pick a lane
One at a time
One at a time
Price for a complete sprint
$10-30k flat
$60k+ retainer
$200k+ / yr
$140k + equity
AI-slop risk
Zero
High
Medium
Medium
Sounds like you
Yes
Sounds like them
Sounds tired
Sounds corporate

// not a knock on agencies. they're built for scale. you don't need scale. you need a cut.

MANIFESTO.txt
$ cat why_we_exist.md

The internet sounds the same now.

Polished. Descriptive. Dead.

Every landing page promises to empower, unlock, streamline. Nobody is allowed to be witty any more.

Your buyer does not want a product description. They want the small, uncomfortable feeling that finally: someone built this for me.

What HuntingHydra believes.
  • Copy that's descriptiveCopy that names the daily pain
  • SEO that feels like magicSEO that's just a logic puzzle
  • Positioning by gut feelPositioning by hypothesis + test
  • UX that screams 'AI-built'UX strategy, brand, journey
  • Hoping ChatGPT mentions youEngineering it so ChatGPT does
  • Outbound burned by handOutbound built once, runs forever
// TL;DR: HuntingHydra is the opposite of a 12-person agency. A focused studio with a sharp blade and a stubborn refusal to ship slop. Positioning, GEO, GTM, copy, SEO, and UX: built to work together, cut by the same hand.
the-model.txt
HuntingHydra
// how it works

Direct engagement. No layers.

No account manager between you and the work. No junior writing the first draft. No “we'll loop in the strategist.” One brief, one contact, shipped.

The kit
TypeScriptCursorClaude + GPTWebflow / NextClayInstantlyAhrefsStatsigFigman8n
WHY_IT_WORKS.md

Strategy, copy, and code.
Same brain. Same week.

The same hands write the page, build the page, wire the funnel that feeds it, and instrument the metric that proves it worked. No briefing chain, no handoff, no delay.

The sprint is a chemistry check as much as a deliverable. If the fit is there and there is more to build, the engagement continues. Most ongoing clients started with a two-week cut.

  • 01Built direct: no juniors writing your homepage, no strategist looped in at the end.
  • 0230+ marketing sites and 12 products shipped. Strategy first, build second, every time.
  • 03Copy and build in one place: the combination agencies cannot offer and freelancers rarely have.
  • 04Every sprint ships with a written prediction. If the bet misses, the wrap call explains exactly why.
  • 05Fixed scope, fixed price, fixed timeline. No retainer that bills you for the same problem twice.
  • 06If the sprint works and there is more to build, the engagement continues.
PRICING.json

Two-week sprint. Fixed.

Price is based on scope: how many heads are bleeding. One, two-to-three, or full engagement. Success is defined before the sprint starts.

SINGLE SPRINTOne head
$10k
/ sprint, all-in

One problem, fixed scope, two weeks. Name the bleeding head and we cut it.

Start the hunt →
MOST HUNTEDTwo or three heads
$20k
/ sprint, all-in

Positioning usually opens two more. Most clients land here after the first call.

Start the hunt →
FULL CUTFour to six heads
$30k
/ sprint, all-in

Full engagement. Every head on the table. Same blade, bigger cut.

Start the hunt →
// ADD-ONS
GEO / AEO retainer
// get cited inside the answer
$2.5k-$12.5k / mo
GTM Engineering build
// scrape, enrich, personalize, book
$3k-$8k one-time
FAQ.txt

Questions before you summon.

No. Work is done end-to-end by the studio: no account managers, no junior writers, no slide deck on Friday. Two weeks, one direct line.

Two weeks because the scope is fixed and the bet is named before we start. No discovery theatre, no stakeholder alignment, no waiting for the design review. The target is agreed, then we ship it.

Then we cut one head. The single-sprint tier is exactly that. Describe the wound and the scope gets confirmed on the first call.

Only for GEO/AEO (it compounds monthly) and GTM engineering pipelines (they need tuning). Everything else is fixed-scope, fixed-price, fixed-timeline. You should not have to pay indefinitely to fix something once.

Probably yes. The $10k tier is for a single sprint once there is something to sharpen. No customers yet means the next move is more buyer conversations, not a sprint.

Every sprint ships with a written prediction: what success looks like, measured how. If the bet misses, the wrap call explains why and what to cut next. No refunds. Just the truth.

Send an email. You'll know in three sentences.

Yes. That is the intention. The sprint is a chemistry check as much as a deliverable. If the fit is there and there is more to build, the engagement continues. Most ongoing clients started with a two-week cut.

SUMMON_HUNTER.exe

Start the hunt.

Pick the head. Describe the wound. One email back tells you if this is the right fit.

Which head? (pick all that apply)

After the sprint

All six heads, finally asleep.

The beast stops thrashing. The robot stops grinding. The founder gets the weekend back. That is the only KPI that matters.

Six-headed hydra sleeping peacefully after the sprint
HuntingHydra logoHuntingHydra

© 2026 HuntingHydra. Cutting heads since founders started growing them.